In Calcutta stands a monument of staggering grandeur—the Victoria Memorial. Towering, ornate, and flanked by sprawling gardens and artificial lakes, it rivals the Taj Mahal in scale and artistry. But why here? Why was it built at a time when Calcutta was losing its status as the capital?
The Victoria Memorial is enormous, filled with magnificent statues, inside and outside in the gardens. Two large statues of Queen Victoria, of superb artistry, stand out. Their style is unmistakably Tartarian.
The question is: Why Calcutta? And when was it built?
The Victoria Memorial: The Timeline Doesn’t Add Up
Let us dig a bit. Queen Victoria expired in 1901. The Victoria Memorial was stared in 1906 and completed in 1921.
At that time, Calcutta was the capital of British India. But in 1911, before the monument was even finished, the British shifted the capital to Delhi.
Why build such a massive structure in Calcutta, knowing it would soon be politically irrelevant?
The Victoria Memorial is gigantic, arguably no less than the Taj Mahal in beauty and grandeur. Two large statues of Queen Victoria dominate the structure, sculpted in exquisite detail.
The Queen had a round face, a plump countenance, and is depicted seated on a throne, holding a staff in one hand and a spherical object in the other.
If you compare these statues with her paintings and photographs, the resemblance is identical.
It is her.
The Tartarian Connection


But let us consider something deeper. If the monument and statues are Tartarian in design, could it mean that Queen Victoria herself was a Tartarian leader?
Was she so significant that a grand memorial had to be built in her honor before our timeline?
The Freemasons, who freely acquired Old World structures, seemingly could not simply reassign this one to a government department, as they did with others.
And then there is her name—Alexandrina Victoria.“Alexandrina” is not a British name. It is Russian—possibly Tartarian.
An Unusual Legacy

After her husband’s death in 1861, Wikipedia states:
She avoided public appearances and rarely set foot in London in the following years. Her weight increased through comfort eating, which reinforced her aversion to public appearances.
Odd. Nevertheless…
This investigation is based on the speculation that Queen Alexandrina Victoria could have been the last Queen of Tartaria, given the gigantic Tartarian-style memorial in Calcutta.
We could be wrong, but we follow a structured method: Hypothesis > Collation of Evidence > Concatenation > Conclusion.
And when we dug deeper, something astounding emerged.
The Evidence So Far






The evidence so far:
- A colossal Victoria Memorial in Calcutta, indisputably Tartarian in scale and artistry.
- Two exquisite sculptures of the Queen, matching her portraits and photographs.
- Her first name is Alexandrina, a Russian name.
- This leads us to speculate: Was she the Tartarian Supreme Leader of the Old World?
So we searched for statues of Queen Victoria. The number is staggering.
There are 160 statues of Queen Victoria worldwide:
- 4 in Africa
- 6 in Asia
- 10 in Australia
- 4 in New Zealand
- 12 in Canada
- 3 in the Caribbean
- 1 in Central America (Belize)
- 6 in Europe
- 22 in India
- 7 in South Africa
- 10 in Scotland
- 63 in England
- 12 in London
That’s 160 statues—all exquisitely Tartarian, all depicting the same person, exactly.
Wikipedia provides the list, but it does not emphasize what this really means.
And there’s more.
The Most Painted Woman in History






Queen Victoria also holds another record—the highest number of painted portraits of any single person.
75 official paintings.
Seventy-five Old World paintings, each with sumptuous details and executed with the highest standards of art.
Does this seem normal? 160 statues and 75 paintings? This certainly means Queen Victoria was the most venerated leader of her time. But which time? Most of these statues are said to have been made between 1904 and 1906.
Yet, Wikipedia fails to mention that Queen Victoria holds the highest number of statues and paintings available online.
Even more strangely—when you search for images of Queen Victoria, these 160+75 depictions are not readily shown.
Why?
What are they hiding?
The Vanishing of Victoria’s Words

If Queen Victoria was a Tartarian leader, we should expect evidence destruction—just as we find with fire narratives surrounding Old World buildings.
And indeed, we do.
Queen Victoria kept a daily journal from the age of 13, writing 2,000 words per day—a total of 60 million words across 45,000 pages. Yet, these writings were systematically destroyed.
Her youngest daughter, Princess Beatrice, was given the task of editing and publishing them. Instead, according to Wikipedia, she: paraphrased all entries in her own words, destroyed two-thirds of the total content, and then burned all the originals.
This process took 30 years, from 1901 to 1931. Finally, 111 notebooks remained. This entire archive was made available online in 2012 but was eventually withdrawn. It is now reportedly accessible only to UK residents.
Who benefits from erasing 45,000 pages of history?
Further Destruction of Evidence

After Queen Victoria’s death, her son, Edward VII, immediately began “modernizing” Windsor Castle.
According to Wikipedia, Edward was “peering into cabinets; ransacking drawers; clearing rooms… dispatching caseloads of relics and ornaments to a special room in the Round Tower throwing out hundreds of photographs…”
Wiki also talks about Edward’s “financier friends, some of whom were Jewish, such as… the Rothschild family.”
And then, within a year of Queen Victoria’s death, Windsor Castle was given away to the state.
The Torus and the Hidden Symbolism





Surely, Queen Victoria was celebrated worldwide, with the largest number of statues and paintings of any ruler in this realm. That alone is stupendous.
The statues display jaw-dropping virtuosity, a level of craftsmanship that could only have been achieved by Old World Tartarian expertise. And with hundreds of statues depicting the same person, we propose:
Queen Victoria was a Tartarian leader.
We also see a massive destruction of evidence—45,000 pages of her journal burned, and her palace given away to Balfour within a year of her death.
And then there’s the ball-like artifact in her left hand. In some statues, it is replaced with a circular flower wreath—a Torus? If this ball is also a Torus, could it be another hidden marker of her true role as a Tartarian leader of the Old World?
A Final Clue: The Griffin of the Coat of Arms

Meanwhile, take a look at the Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom, still in use today. It prominently features a Griffin. See for yourself. The Griffin, a symbol of guardianship, a marker of lost realms.
A remnant of an erased empire?
One thing is certain: Queen Victoria was no ordinary ruler.
The memorials, statues, paintings, and destruction of records all point to something far greater than the history books admit.
The question is—what was erased, and why?



